It is very funny that you (Cofty) attack me any time you get the possibility. If you like it, continue doing so.
If nobody knows nothing, how can it be an act of humility? If you are happy to be a believer, good for you.
if a jw asks me "-do you believe in god?
" and i answer "-no, i dont believe in god" he/she assumes that i m not interested.
and that s because of a total closed mind.
It is very funny that you (Cofty) attack me any time you get the possibility. If you like it, continue doing so.
If nobody knows nothing, how can it be an act of humility? If you are happy to be a believer, good for you.
if a jw asks me "-do you believe in god?
" and i answer "-no, i dont believe in god" he/she assumes that i m not interested.
and that s because of a total closed mind.
A much better "one-question" would be "Are you open for that God may exists?"
if a jw asks me "-do you believe in god?
" and i answer "-no, i dont believe in god" he/she assumes that i m not interested.
and that s because of a total closed mind.
If a JW asks me "-Do you believe in God?" and I answer "-No, I dont believe in God" he/she assumes that I´m not interested. And that´s because of a total closed mind. If someone ask question "A" he should also ask question "B" if the first answer is "No".
The second question should obviously be in style of: "-Do you believe that God does not exist?" If the answer is "yes" we have a situation where TWO believers are talking to each other. (One who believe in God and the other who believe the opposite)
But if the answer is "No"....it´s something they cannot think of! But if someone is open minded (open for that God may or may not exist) that´s how the answer will be, and it requires two questions to figure that out. That´s why the "do you believe....?"-question is absurd.
I have never visited the Kingdom Hall. I guess I have missed a lot of new fresh light over the years
Yes, Nonjwspouse, it is. They admitted that they have had expectations....how is that possible without using the brain?
The difference between a believer, an arrogant man and a proud man (or organisation) is second to none.
my 90+ yr old grandfather was a jw elder, he's in a nursing home now & we're sorting through his old stuff.. has a lot of jw books, including wt archive compilation books all the way back to 1952. this stuff will probably all be thrown out.
we're all moving house so continuing to store it all would be a pain in the ass.. i remember hearing that the wtbts changed a lot of stuff when they transcribed all the books to dvd (and continue to deny it).
i've never actually bothered looking into it, but it'd be nice to be able to have some hard evidence i can later throw into people's faces >:] .. so, are there any good ones i should save?
yeah....put it on Ebay. It can end up in a very high final price I would bid for sure
At least Jehovah´s Witnesses believe they are open minded. That´s a good thing because believing is soooo much more important than to know.
Also, "based on....no human thinking", what does that mean? How can that be explained without human thinking????????
my 90+ yr old grandfather was a jw elder, he's in a nursing home now & we're sorting through his old stuff.. has a lot of jw books, including wt archive compilation books all the way back to 1952. this stuff will probably all be thrown out.
we're all moving house so continuing to store it all would be a pain in the ass.. i remember hearing that the wtbts changed a lot of stuff when they transcribed all the books to dvd (and continue to deny it).
i've never actually bothered looking into it, but it'd be nice to be able to have some hard evidence i can later throw into people's faces >:] .. so, are there any good ones i should save?
You have a treasue. If you throw them away the GB will thank you!
or the 2000's generation thing?.
how did you feel?
how did it help you wake up?
Good for us that we have "proof" that Jehohav has PROMISED us that the gen of 1914 will not (entirely) pass away until Armageddon starts.
and that it´s very clear that Jesus meant "people who were living 1914."
These is scriptual WT "proof", all one need to confront any "over-lapping" nonsens.
can the governing body of hypocrites ever admit that they are wrong?
the watchtower august 1st 1978 issue, page 3:.
can you admit when you are wrong?.
........